Legal Opinion

Peabody Energy Corp. v. Roark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2012No. 14A01-1112-CT-555PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Peabody Energy Corporation, Peabody Coal Company, LLC, and Black Beauty Coal Company (collectively, “Peabody”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Beelman Truck Company (“Beelman”) and North American Capacity Insurance Company (“NAC”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Issue

The dispositive issue we address is whether Peabody is an additional insured under an insurance policy issued by NAC.

Facts

Peabody owns property in Daviess County where it conducts mining operations, and Beelman is a trucking company. Beelman and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perdue v. GarganoIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Masten v. Amco Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Davis v. Ltv Steel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Northbrook Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darliss Wert and Gary Wert v. Meridian Security Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Peabody Energy Corp., Peabody Coal Co., LLC, and Black Beauty Coal Co. v. Richard F. Roark and Beelman Truck Co., and North American Capacity Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. Erie Insurance ExchangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JakubowiczIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Howell Tractor and Equipment, LLC v. Alliance Tank Service, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API