Legal Opinion

Bachman v. AMCO Insurance

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 20, 2012No. Case No. 3:10-CV-461 JDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JON E. DEGUILIO, District Judge.

This action arises from a breach of contract dispute between Plaintiffs Jeremy and Debra Bachman (the Bachmans) and their insurer, AMCO Insurance Company (AMCO). The issue is whether AMCO properly limited the recovery for collector sports cards stolen during a burglary of the Bachmans’ home under the business property coverage limitation contained in the Bachmans’ homeowners insurance policy. AMCO’s motion for summary judgment [DE 20, 21] is ripe since a response [DE 25, 26] and reply [DE 27] were filed. For the following reasons, AMCO’s motion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Massey, Michael v. Johnson, MableCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. National Athletic Sportswear, Inc. v. Westfield InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ER Group, LLC. v. Great American Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  2. Medley v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024
  3. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. NelsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
  4. TAYLOR v. TREXIS INSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API