Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Chandler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2009No. 49S05-0904-CV-150PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

A provision of the automobile insurance policy at issue here precludes any recovery under its uninsured motorist provisions unless the proceeding commences within two years after the accident. Injured driver Bradshaw first sued driver Chandler and Bradshaw's insurance company mentioning only his policy's underinsured motorist provisions. More than two years after the accident, Bradshaw learned that Chandler was excluded from the insurance policy on the vehicle he had been driving. Bradshaw amended his complaint to include his policy's uninsured motorist coverage…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wagner v. YatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Caywood v. Supreme Lodge, Knights & LadiesIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Keckler v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Telamon Corporation v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. USA Gymnastics v. Liberty Insurance UnderwriterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  5. Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API