Legal Opinion

People v. Yachimowicz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1943No. Crim. 3639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, P. J.

The defendant was charged in an amended information filed in the superior court with three offenses, burglary, grand theft and receiving stolen property. Count I, charging burglary, was dismissed “in the interest of justice,” . and upon a jury-waived trial he was found “not guilty” of receiving stolen property and “guilty” of the crime of grand theft, for which offense he was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed by law. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial and contends, first, that there was a material variance in the property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. People v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. People v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. HowesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. BarrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API