Legal Opinion
People v. Holland
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1958No. Crim. 3371PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Appellant was charged in four counts with violations of the Health and Safety Code, all dealing with prohibited offenses in connection with narcotics. The jury failed to reach a verdict on Counts 1 and 2 and those counts have been dismissed. Appellant was found guilty on Count 3 (sale of heroin on August 23, 1956) and Count 4 (maintaining a place for sale etc. of narcotics, Health & Saf. Code, § 11557).
The sales charged were testified to have been made to one Marge Haclmey, a female narcotics addict. Since the charges on Counts 1 and 2 have been dismissed we shall detail only the evidence…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. DessauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.