People v. Howes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Appellant, Vernon LeRoy Howes, was found guilty of grand theft. From the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted. Appellant contends that the information was insufficient, that the evidence, at most, shows a series of petty thefts and not grand theft, and that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in its rulings, instructions and comments. There is no merit in any of these contentions.
Facts
Crowley and Traulsen, a partnership, operate a general garage business in Watsonville. The garage operated a tire department which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. BenenatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. CrosbyUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. Nor WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.