Legal Opinion

Ledesma v. Urban Renewal Agcy. of City of Edinburg

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 24, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-B-65PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Senior District Judge,

Sitting by Designation.

The above-styled cause was heard by the Court without a jury and taken under submission on March 1, 1977. The Court, after examining the pleadings and the evidence presented at the trial, enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Ledesma, have filed this action against the Urban Renewal Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development seeking a declaratory judgment that the denial of a relocation housing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. BrinegarDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  2. Audrey Tullock v. State Highway Commission of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Seeherman v. LynnDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of ChesapeakeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. Beaird-Poulan Division of Emerson Electric Co. v. Department of HighwaysDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  4. Albright v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Abdo Ahmad Nagi v. United States of America and City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API