Legal Opinion
Seeherman v. Lynn
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 1975No. Civ. 74-993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are residents of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, who owned property which was acquired by the defendant Redevelopment Authority of the City of Wilkes-Barre pursuant to a federally-assisted urban renewal program in South Wilkes-Barre in July of 1973. In this suit, they challenge the legality of their being denied, in connection with that acquisition, an allowance for replacement housing pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4623, which is part of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (U.R.A.), 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq. Defendants are the Secretary of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beaird-Poulan Division of Emerson Electric Co. v. Department of HighwaysDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Ledesma v. Urban Renewal Agcy. of City of EdinburgDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1977
- Albright v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979