Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Little

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 2004No. 96,978PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, V.C.J.

¶ 1 The following questions are pressed for decision on certiorari: (1) Does landowners’ receipt of an administratively determined relocation assistance payment preclude them from seeking reimbursement for relocation expenses in the condemnation proceeding? and (2) Does the record establish that the jury compensated landowners for both the fair market value of certain improvements and for the cost of reestablishing the same improvements at their new business location? We answer both questions in the negative, but in the absence of a timely landowners’ quest for certiorari relief…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Oklahoma State Department of Health v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. BNSF Railway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API