Legal Opinion
Abdo Ahmad Nagi v. United States of America and City of Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1985No. 83-1263PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALINSKI, District Judge.
Plaintiff Abdo Ahmad Nagi appeals a judgment of the district court upholding a determination by the City of Detroit that he and his wife, Tamniah Nagi, were ineligible for replacement housing benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4623.
Nagi and his wife were the owners of a home located in Detroit, Michigan, where they had lived with their five children since 1973. The Nagis immigrated to the United States in 1969 from Yemen Arab Republic. They became naturalized U.S. Citizens and Mr. Nagi was employed as a laborer by Chrysler Corporation.
In August 1979, the Nagi family…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O-J Transport Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and Associated Truck Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Kroger Company v. Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Supreme Oil Company v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Metro-North Commuter Rail Division and New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Herbert Whitaker E.F. Martin v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Skaggs v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1991