Legal Opinion
Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 1931No. 22063PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This appeal, as presented, is from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest of the appellant, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Comp'any, as to the levy of six mills made by the excise board of Lincoln county for the benefit of the city of Stroud for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.
A levy of six mills was made for current expenses. The protest is based upon five items In the appropriation, as not being sufficiently itemized. Four of the protested items are in the general expense account of the city designated as being for “sundry expenses.” The protest charges an aggregate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- People ex rel. Abt v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Jones v. BlaineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- People ex rel. Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Protest of DowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Kurn v. HelmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Leonard v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Public Service Co. v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.