Legal Opinion

Leonard v. City of Wagoner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1936No. 22489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Upon suit by the city to recover of its treasurer and his bondsmen sums of money paid out by the treasurer upon warrants issued in excess of appropriations made, and approved, the city recovered judgment for $4,000, and upon payment thereof by the bondsmen, and judgment in their favor against the treasurer for the amount so paid, the treasurer has appealed.

The question presented .here is stated by plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the treasurer, in his brief as follows;

“Plaintiff’s petition, in each of its alleged causes of action, proceeds upon the theory that the board of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meder v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. City of McAlester v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Public Service Co. v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Meder v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Pham v. Wuu Jau Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API