Legal Opinion
In Re Bliss
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 1929No. 20460PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
Charles W. Bliss and others protested certain tax levies made by the excise board of Tulsa county for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, as illegal and excessive. An appeal was taken by the pro-testee from the judgment directing the cancellation .of portions of the levy, and by the Protestant from the judgment sustaining portions of the levy. We will discuss the various grounds of protest separately.
The protestant jiresents, as the first proposition, tlie levy of 1.3 mills of the Tulsa county general fund, consisting of two items. The protest as to .16 mills on tlie first item wag…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Aaronson v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Meder v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.