Legal Opinion
Wells v. Childers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 4, 1945No. 32272PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an original proceeding brought in this court by the plaintiff, J. K. Wells, attacking the constitutionality of House Bill No. 518 enacted by the Twentieth Legislature, creating the Governor’s Contingency Fund. In the action Robert Burns filed a petition in intervention asserting the unconstitutionality of House Bill No. 518 and also asserting that >■ Senate Bill No. 197 of the Nineteenth Legislature, Session Laws of 1943, p. 328, was unconstitutional for the same reasons as those urged against House Bill No. 518.
The attack by the plaintiff and inter-vener upon House Bill No. 518 is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- School Dist. No. 25 v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Schmitt v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.