Legal Opinion

Kurn v. Helm

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1938No. 26862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Newman Helm, county treasurer of Pushmataha county, invested certain funds in his custody and control in nonpayable warrants theretofore issued by said county. Two classes of funds were so invested: (1) County sinking funds; and (2) county emergency funds accruing under the provisions of chapter 137, Sess. L. 1933. Collections from ad valorem taxes and other sources were insufficient to pay the warrants in which said funds were invested. Thereupon the county treasurer commenced this action against the board of county commissioners to reduce said warrants to judgment.

J. M. Kurn and John G.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. City of Wilburton v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. City of Ashland v. CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Phillips v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Wright v. Stapp-Zoe Consolidated School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Bowen v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Thompson v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Opinion No. 71-172 (1971) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API