Legal Opinion

Peirce v. Jones

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1899No. 2,728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.

— The appellee, Anna E. Jones, brought her. action against the appellant as receiver of the Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas City Eailroad Company, for damages for a personal injury suffered in passing over the track of the railroad at a street crossing in the city of Kokomo, through the negligence of the servants of the defendant. There was a general verdict for the appellee, her damages being assessed at $1,000.

It is urged on behalf of the appellant that the evidence failed to show sufficiently that the appellee was free from contributory negligence. The casualty occurred between 10 and 11…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Michigan Central RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. HaverstickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Peirce v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API