Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. Haverstick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1905No. 5,195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Morgan Circuit Court; George W. Grubbs, Special Judge. Action fey James M. TIaverstick against the Indianapolis Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff on a verdict for $100, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for injuries sustained by Mm while he was a passenger on one of its cars in the city of Indianapolis. His complaint was in one paragraph, to which an answer in two paragraphs was filed.

Two errors are assigned: (1) That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The first error assigned is waived by appellant’s failure to discuss it. The errors relied upon, as presented by the overruling of the motion for a new trial, rest upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brown v. Russell & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Fairbanks v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hart v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cogswell v. West Street & North End Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Hall v. Proctor Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. City of Indianapolis v. MullallyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API