Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Stegemeier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1889No. 14,473PublishedCited by 68 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee, in her complaint, alleges that the appellant was required by an ordinance of the city of Fort "Wayne to keep a flagman to give warning to travellers at tljie crossing of its railroad track and Hanna street, a public street of that city; that it had erected gates at the crossing, and had stationed a flagman there; that appellee’s intestate went upon the crossing and was struck and killed by one of the appellant’s trains; that the gates were open at the time, and the flagman was in his shed; that no warning was given, and that the intestate was free from contributory negligence.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greany v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State v. Washington Social Library Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1841
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dolan v. . Delaware and Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Richmond v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API