Peirce v. Ray
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellee brought his action against the appellant as receiver of the Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas *303City Railroad Company, to recover damages for the killing of appellee’s two horses, and the destruction of their harness, and injury to his wagon, and for personal injury to the appellee, caused by the collision, through appellant’s negligence, of a locomotive engine with appellee’s team and wagon at a public crossing on appellant’s railway in the town of Greentown, in Howard county. A demurrer to the complaint for want of sufficient facts was overruled. There was an answer in denial, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiwirowski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dieckman v. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co. v. DaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913