Legal Opinion

Newton v. City of Winston-Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1988No. 8821SC188PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether defendant city is liable in damages to plaintiff for demolishing plaintiffs building without complying with the procedural requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 160A-441 through -450. The trial court held as a matter of law that defendant had not served plaintiff with complaints and orders in accordance with § 160A-445. Nevertheless, the trial court instructed the jury that, if it found that defendant “use[d] reasonable diligence to provide actual notice to Plaintiff ... so that Plaintiff had timely notice to protect his rights,”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Horton v. GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Solly v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Monroe v. City of New BernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Patterson v. CITY OF GASTONIACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Cheatham v. Town of TaylortownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Al-Nasra v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Cheatham v. Town of TaylortownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API