Legal Opinion

Horton v. Gulledge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1970No. 41PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The evidence, though in conflict, includes testimony which supports the findings of fact made by the Housing Commission and approved by the Superior Court. Consequently, for the purpose of this appeal, we accept as true the findings that the petitioner’s house is presently unfit for human habitation and dangerous, and that repairs necessary to bring it into conformity with the Housing Code will cost 60%, or more, of the present value of the building. These findings were made after notice and after a hearing in which the record discloses no failure to comply with prescribed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Village of Lake Villa v. StokovichIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API