Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Town of Taylortown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2017No. COA16-1057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*660 MURPHY, Judge.

*614 Adam T. Cheatham, Sr. ("Cheatham") appeals from the trial court's order allowing Town of Taylortown's ("Taylortown") motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by granting the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Taylortown's attempts to enforce its minimum housing standards: (1) violated his property rights; (2) obstructed justice; and (3) deprived him of procedural due process. We disagree that the trial court erred to the extent Cheatham's claims arise from enforcement actions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Newton v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Trivette v. YountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Harrell v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Axler v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. Town of TaylortownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC v. Boyz Transportation Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API