Legal Opinion
Lebrun v. England
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 11, 2002No. Civil Action 00-1391(RBW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”) and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes that defendant’s motion to dismiss must be denied because plaintiff timely filed his complaint with this Court in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) (2000), and the equitable doctrine of laches is not a bar to the filing of this action. However, because the Court must defer to the agency’s substantive…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Havens v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Rempfer v. U.S. Department of Air Force Board for Correction of Military RecordsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Brewer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Havens v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Huffman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.