Mayo v. Beber
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
After a trial by jury in a malpractice action, a judgment was entered in favor of the defendant pursuant to the verdict of the jury. A motion for a new trial was made. In support of that motion, an affidavit was filed on behalf of appellant for the purpose of sustaining her contention that the trial judge had been disqualified to try the case because of the provisions of section 170, subdivision 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure. That motion, heard by a judge other than the judge who had presided at the trial, was denied. The propriety of such denial is the only question presented on this…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. OaxacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.