Legal Opinion
Hardin Oldsmobile v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1997No. C022987PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
The jurisdiction of the New Motor Vehicle Board (Board) has limits. The claims asserted by the plaintiff, Hardin Oldsmobile (Hardin), are not within those limits. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s contrary finding and remand for the court to issue a writ prohibiting the Board from exercising jurisdiction over Hardin’s claims.
Facts and Procedural History
This litigation arises from Hardin’s allegations of misdealing by Honda. Hardin claims Honda’s executives received bribes and kickbacks in exchange for favors concerning the allocation of new cars and the location…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- McKee v. Bell-Carter Olive Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bradshaw v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- South Bay Creditors Trust v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Daimlerchrysler Motors Co. v. Lew Williams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Tovas v. American Honda Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Duarte & Witting, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.