Daimlerchrysler Motors Co. v. Lew Williams, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
In violation of an agreement not to protest, a car dealer
protested a manufacturer’s notice of its intent to establish a new car dealership. As a result of the protest, the manufacturer determined not to establish the new dealership. The company who had sought the dealership, not a party to this appeal, sued the manufacturer. In turn, the manufacturer filed a cross-complaint against the protesting dealer. The dealer filed a motion under the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) 1 to have the cross-complaint stricken,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Seelig v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Pennsbury Village Associates, LLC v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Rouse v. Law Offices of Rory ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Los Feliz Ford, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Moss Bros. Toy, Inc. v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.