Legal Opinion

Daimlerchrysler Motors Co. v. Lew Williams, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 2006No. C049340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

In violation of an agreement not to protest, a car dealer

protested a manufacturer’s notice of its intent to establish a new car dealership. As a result of the protest, the manufacturer determined not to establish the new dealership. The company who had sought the dealership, not a party to this appeal, sued the manufacturer. In turn, the manufacturer filed a cross-complaint against the protesting dealer. The dealer filed a motion under the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) 1 to have the cross-complaint stricken,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Seelig v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Pennsbury Village Associates, LLC v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Rouse v. Law Offices of Rory ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
  4. Los Feliz Ford, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Moss Bros. Toy, Inc. v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API