Legal Opinion

McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1989No. L.A. 32062PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In this appeal we consider whether a provision of the Santa Monica Rent Control Charter Amendment (art. XVIII, Santa Monica City Charter, hereafter Charter Amendment) which provides for administrative adjudication of excess rent claims and imposition of treble damages (id., *353former1 § 1809, subd. (b)) is unconstitutional because it permits the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) to exercise judicial powers in violation of article VI, section 1 of the California Constitution.

We will conclude that administrative adjudication of excess rent claims under the Charter…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API