McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
In this appeal we consider whether a provision of the Santa Monica Rent Control Charter Amendment (art. XVIII, Santa Monica City Charter, hereafter Charter Amendment) which provides for administrative adjudication of excess rent claims and imposition of treble damages (id., *353former1 § 1809, subd. (b)) is unconstitutional because it permits the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) to exercise judicial powers in violation of article VI, section 1 of the California Constitution.
We will conclude that administrative adjudication of excess rent claims under the Charter…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.