Legal Opinion

Michigan Central Railroad v. Morgan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The garnishee defendants by writ of error review a judgment rendered against them by reason of a sale of personal property made to them by the principal defendants without complying with the provisions of the bulk sales act.

A preliminary question is presented. The trial was had before the‘court without a jury. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested or filed. It is urged by appellee that “there is no question before this court to decide.” We have on many occasions considered the effect of a failure to comply with Circuit Court Rule No. 45. In Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Gallus v. ElmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Western Massachusetts Insurance v. RikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Sampson v. Brandon Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Durham v. Raleigh Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API