Michigan Central Railroad v. Morgan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The garnishee defendants by writ of error review a judgment rendered against them by reason of a sale of personal property made to them by the principal defendants without complying with the provisions of the bulk sales act.
A preliminary question is presented. The trial was had before the‘court without a jury. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested or filed. It is urged by appellee that “there is no question before this court to decide.” We have on many occasions considered the effect of a failure to comply with Circuit Court Rule No. 45. In Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Gallus v. ElmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Western Massachusetts Insurance v. RikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Sampson v. Brandon Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Durham v. Raleigh Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1943