Legal Opinion

Sparling v. Smeltzer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1905No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Benzie; Chittenden, J. Replevin by Joseph Sparling against Joseph Smeltzer. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

This action is replevin for a cow and calf owned by plaintiff and held by defendant, who claimed they were estrays. The case was tried without a jury. No findings of fact or of law were requested, or were made. *462The court, at the conclusion of the trial, stated his views generally, and these remarks are in the record. No exceptions were taken to any of the conclusions announced. The errors assigned are based upon rulings made in admitting and rejecting evidence, and upon the opinion of the court and the entry of judgment. As to the first, wg have examined them, and are not convinced that any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simon v. ZarevichMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wilson v. HugusMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API