Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Wilson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 28, 2005No. 26089PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
BB T of South Carolina (Appellant) appeals a lower court order quashing a subpoena duces tecum, which Appellant issued to a nonparty prior to commencing any procedure to enforce a judgment. We certified the case for review from the Court of Appeals, pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We dismiss the appeal because the lower court order…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Express Freight Lines, Incorporated, Appeal of Christopher A. JansenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Municipal Ass'n v. AT & T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kriti Ripley, LLC v. Emerald Investments, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Norwest Props., LLC v. StreblerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. LooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.