Legal Opinion

Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. Long

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 2010No. 4756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Fireworks Supermarket (Neeltec) appeals the special referee’s order substituting two corporations, Foxy’s Firework Superstore, Inc. and Hobo *178Joe’s, Inc., as defendants in Neeltec’s action against Willard Long d/b/a Foxy’s Fireworks and d/b/a Fireworks Superstore.1 We dismiss2 Neeltec’s appeal because the special referee’s order is not immediately appealable.

“An appeal ordinarily may be pursued only after a party has obtained a final judgment.” Hagood v. Sommerville, 362 S.C. 191, 194, 607 S.E.2d 707, 708 (2005) (citing Mid-State Distribs., Inc. v. Century…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Knowles v. STANDARD SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Duncan v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Hudson v. LANCASTER CONVALESCENT CENTERCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API