Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 20, 2002No. 25470PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
This appeal is from a trial court’s Order granting summary judgment in favor of Charleston Lincoln Mercury (CLM). The trial court found that Patricia Ferguson could not recover under the South Carolina Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 56-15-10 to 56-15-130 (1991 & Supp.2001) (the Dealers Act), for allegedly fraudulent acts committed by CLM against her deceased husband, Howard Ferguson. The Court of Appeals affirmed on an additional sustaining ground. We affirm as modified.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Howard Ferguson entered into an agreement with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. Chesterfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Anderson v. the Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Redwend Ltd. Partnership v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.