Municipal Ass'n v. AT & T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR, we accepted the following question on certification from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina: “Does South Carolina law allow municipalities to impose by ordinance a 5% per month penalty for the late payment of business license taxes?” We hold South Carolina law allows municipalities to impose such a penalty by ordinance.
BACKGROUND FACTS 1
The plaintiff Municipal Association of South Carolina (MASC) is a non-profit organization composed of 229 municipalities in South Carolina. 2 In 1999, the General Assembly enacted the South Carolina…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina, Inc. v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- McAbee v. Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
3Cited by23 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.