Legal Opinion

Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1993No. 23792PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice;

This case arises from a pretrial denial of a motion, under Rule 12(b)(2), SCRCP, to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We DISMISS the appeal as interlocutory.

Facts

Respondent, Mid-State Distributors (Mid-State), brought an action against Appellant, Carlton and United Breweries Limited (Carlton), 1 alleging that Mid-State’s beer distributorship franchise was wrongfully terminated in violation of Title 61, Chapter 9 of the S.C. Code of Laws (1976). After Mid-State made several amendments to the summons and complaint, Carlton filed a motion to dismiss the action for lack of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Plastics Co. v. Southern Commerce BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Hammond v. Butler, Means, Evins & BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. CB ASKINS v. Firedoor Corp. of Fla.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Good v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Ferguson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Cockrell v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API