Legal Opinion

Novak v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1934No. Appeal 91PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an appeal from the affirmance of an award by the workmen’s compensation board for industrial loss of the use of an eye. The claimant, a coal loader employed by Hustead Semans Coal & Coke Company, was injured in the course of his employment by a foreign body striking his left eye. Compensation was paid to him for total disability until May 21, 1929, when he executed a final receipt and returned to his former employment. Subsequently he filed a petition for review, claiming the loss of vision of his left eye “for all practical, industrial purposes” as a result of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Chovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClemens v. Penn Auto PartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Reigle v. ShollySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Leed v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Roveran v. Franklinshire Worsted MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API