Chovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 126, April T., 1918, by defendant, from order of C. P. Beaver Co., December Term, 1917, No. 83, dismissing appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board allowing claim in case of Mike Cbovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Co. Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Board. Before Baldwin, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was, among others, order of the court dismissing the appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is a proceeding to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The plaintiff was injured in the course of his employment, by having a steel slab fall upon his right hand. He filed his claim with the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the referee allowed him compensation based on a finding of fact that he had suffered the permanent loss of the use of his right hand and therefore came within paragraph ■(c) of Section 306, of Article III of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915; which provides as follows: “Permanent loss of the use of a hand, arm, foot,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by14 opinions
- Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Conley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Morrow v. James S. Murray & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.