Legal Opinion

Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1922No. Appeal, No. 76PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This is an appeal from the affirmance of an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board and depends on the sufficiency of evidence to sustain the award. Claimant was a machinist at the Cramp shipyard, and on August 18, 1920, while engaged in erecting machinery, was “reaming a pipe out for fitting a knuckle gear in” when the pipe struck him in the right eye and injured it. Compensation was agreed to and on November 5, 1920, claimant executed the final receipt stating that *70disability ceased. He returned to tbe shipyard and was put to work testing castings and packing pistons,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Pater v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Kerwin v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Berskis v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Schrock v. Stonycreek Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Alessandro Petrillo Co. v. MarioniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1925
  5. McClemens v. Penn Auto PartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API