Legal Opinion

Reigle v. Sholly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1940No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The claimant, John E. Reigle, seeks compensation for the loss of his right eye. On June 29, 1933, while employed by a stranger to this proceeding, he met with an accident that resulted in a traumatic cataract on that eye. As the obstruction grew the sight was gradually impaired so that on June 29, 1937, he did not have the use of the eye. He made claim for compensation on account of this accident, but it was denied on the ground that the application was not made within the period re quired by the statute. On the latter date, while in the course of his employment with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Novak v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Flood v. Logan Iron & Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. DeVore v. Atlantic Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Shannon v. TURISSINISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API