Legal Opinion
Jameson v. Gavett
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1937No. Civ. 2022PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, Acting P. J.
The plaintiff herein, a boy 12 years of age, brought this action through his guardian ad litem against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of an assault and battery committed upon him by the defendant, Jack Gavett. Liability was sought to be imposed upon the defendants other than Gavett because of the alleged relationship of master and servant which existed between said defendants and Gavett and because it was alleged that the act which resulted in plaintiff’s injuries was committed by Gavett in the course and within the scope of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hiroshima v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Novick v. GouldsberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Sullivan v. MattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Espinoza v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.