Legal Opinion
Novick v. Gouldsberry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1949No. 11869PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
On December 20, 1946, Appellee, Anson E. Gouldsberry, plaintiff below, filed an action in the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, Third Division, against four defendants, William H. Novick, Annetta No-vick, William Carroll and Lucille Carroll. The Novicks, who are the appellants here, are the owners and operators of a bar at Seward, Alaska, known as “Novick’s Cocktail Lounge.” William Carroll was the bartender. On July 5, 1946, Gouldsberry, according to his complaint, was assaulted by the Carrolls and Annetta Novick. As a result of his injuries, he was unable…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Sunseri v. PucciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.