Tyre v. Aetna Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiffs, the widow and three adult daughters of the insured, appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover the widow’s community property interest in the proceeds of a life insurance policy.
The facts are not in dispute. Rebecca Tyre (hereafter called plaintiff) and Louis Tyre, the insured, were married in Los Angeles in 1917 and lived there as husband and wife until Mr. Tyre’s death in 1957. Defendant issued its policy in the face amount of $20,000 upon the life of the insured in 1926. All the premiums were paid from community funds. *402The original beneficiary was the Tyre…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.