Legal Opinion

Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1971No. Civ. 28244PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission from a judgment against them in favor of Bayside Timber Company, Inc., directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate.

By ordinance, San Mateo County purports to regulate logging operations within the county by “use permit.” 1 The county also by ordinance, “to protect the natural beauty of the County and protect property owners from unnecessary loss from erosion and flooding from grading operations,” regulates excavation and grading for road purposes. 2

Respondent Bayside…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API