Legal Opinion

Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11543PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover part of the proceeds of a life insurance policy upon the ground that the same constituted community property.

Briefly stated, the facts of the ease set forth in the record, are these: In 1900, George W. A. Blethen and plaintiff in termarried. Subsequent thereto, in December, 1914, the appellant Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, a corporation, issued to Blethen two policies of life insurance in the sum of $4,000, respectively. One of these policies was permitted to lapse. In the other policy Blethen’s sister, Alice M. Scott, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API