Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover part of the proceeds of a life insurance policy upon the ground that the same constituted community property.
Briefly stated, the facts of the ease set forth in the record, are these: In 1900, George W. A. Blethen and plaintiff in termarried. Subsequent thereto, in December, 1914, the appellant Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, a corporation, issued to Blethen two policies of life insurance in the sum of $4,000, respectively. One of these policies was permitted to lapse. In the other policy Blethen’s sister, Alice M. Scott, was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.