Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1983No. 242, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

We hold that a defendant in a civil contempt proceeding 1 has no right to a jury trial and cannot be sentenced to incarceration unless he has been afforded the right to have counsel present closing argument.

On September 7, 1979, a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County found Kenneth Edward Lee, appellant, guilty of the criminal non-support of his children in violation of Md.Ann.Code, art. 27, § 88(b) (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.). He was sentenced to three years to the Division of Corrections. This sentence was immediately suspended in favor of three years of supervised…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Emileigh F.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Cherry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Baker v. BakerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Dishman v. DishmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API