Rutherford v. Katzenberger
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
Murphy, C. J., concurs in part and dissents in part and filed a concurring and dissenting opinion at page 365 infra.
We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in these cases to decide whether, as a matter of due process, a defendant in a civil contempt proceeding, in which the court orders actual incarceration, has the right to counsel including government furnished counsel if the defendant is indigent. We hold that this right is guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and by Art. 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights.
*349I.
The relevant facts in each of the two…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.