Legal Opinion

Cheff v. Schnackenberg

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1966No. 67PublishedCited by 429 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Clark

This is a companion case to No. 412, Shillitani v. United States, and No. 442, Pappadio v. United States, ante, p. 364. Unlike those cases, this is a criminal contempt proceeding.

Upon petition of the Federal Trade Commission, Cheff was charged, along with Holland Furnace Company and 10 other of its officers, with criminal contempt of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The alleged contemnors were tried before a panel of three judges of the Court of Appeals without a jury. The corporation and three of its officers, including Cheff, were found guilty of violating a previous order of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by429 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

424 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API