Legal Opinion

Cherry v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1985No. 565, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*427GARRITY, Judge.

This matter involves our review of a case wherein the trial court, without objection, proceeded to announce its verdict immediately after denying defense’s motion for judgment of acquittal. The appellant contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error per se in finding her guilty without first affording defense counsel an opportunity to make a closing argument on her behalf.

The appellant, Mary E. Cherry, was convicted by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Raine, J.) of theft of goods having a value of less than $300. The trial had proceeded by way of a Statement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Howard L. Bashor v. Henry Risley, Warden of Montana State Prison and Michael Greely, Attorney General for the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cherry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. In Re Emileigh F.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Cason v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API