Turner v. Terhune
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Petitioner Tracy Turner appeals the district court’s decision to deny his current habeas corpus petition as untimely. We reverse and remand with instructions that the district court consider Turner’s claims. The facts of this case are familiar to the parties and we recite them here only to the extent necessary.
I. Successive Petitions under AEDPA.
Turner filed two petitions in federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 before filing the current petition from which he appeals. Under the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), a petitioner is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ward v. WolfenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Allred v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Carr v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Daryl Rogers v. Jack WarnerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Fischer v. PerkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.