Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare Division
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal confronts us with a trial court’s efforts to expedite the disposition of numerous complaints filed by a prisoner, pro se. We must determine whether the district court erred in dismissing on its own motion before issuance of summonses thirty-three of Franklin’s pro se complaints for which Franklin paid the filing fees.1 We hold that the dismissal of actions on the court’s own motion before issuance of summonses is proper only when it is clear that the court lacks jurisdiction. We, therefore, reverse the dismissal of eleven of Franklin’s actions over which…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by562 opinions
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Keith A. Berg v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
557 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.