Legal Opinion

Daryl Rogers v. Jack Warner

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 9, 2026No. 3:26-cv-05148Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 DARYL ROGERS, CASE NO. 3:26-cv-05148-TMC-GJL 11 Petitioner, v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 JACK WARNER, Noting Date: March 24, 2026 13 Respondent. 14 15 The District Court has referred this 28 U.S.C § 2254 habeas action to United States 16 Magistrate Judge Grady J. Leupold. Petitioner Daryl Rogers, proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis, initiated this action by filing a federal habeas Petition. Dkts. 5, 6. Upon review, the 18 undersigned determines the Petition is an unauthorized successive…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API